Snowflake vs Amazon Redshift for Data Virtualization
Optimize Your Data Strategy Success
Snowflake and Amazon Redshift are leading cloud data warehouse platforms, each offering features to query data without moving or copying it (i.e., data virtualization).
This comparison focuses on how Snowflake and Redshift handle external data access, including supported virtualization features, external data sources and formats, ideal use cases, integration with BI tools and catalogs, performance, pricing, and cloud ecosystem support. The goal is to provide a structured, up-to-date overview of their capabilities in data virtualization.
What Makes These Data Warehouses Unique?
Redshift – AWS-Integrated Excellence
Amazon Redshift provides a fully managed data warehouse that gives you complete control within the AWS ecosystem. This makes it perfect for organizations already invested in Amazon’s cloud infrastructure.
Key benefits of Redshift:
-
Seamless AWS service integration with other AWS services
-
Massively parallel processing power for complex queries
-
High-performance querying capabilities for large datasets
-
Robust support for data security and access management
Redshift’s architecture leverages compute nodes organized in clusters, distributing your data across these nodes for parallel processing. This approach gives you granular control over your compute resources, enabling detailed optimization of query processing and workload management.
For companies deeply embedded in the AWS ecosystem, Redshift offers native integration with services like S3, Glue, and Kinesis Data Firehose, creating a cohesive data processing environment with unified security policies.
Snowflake – Multi-Cloud Flexibility
Snowflake offers a cloud-agnostic approach to data warehousing that provides remarkable flexibility. Snowflake users enjoy a platform that adapts to their existing infrastructure rather than forcing changes.
Key benefits of Snowflake:
-
Separation of storage and compute resources
-
Pay-as-you-go pricing model with on demand pricing
-
Support for diverse data types including semi structured data
-
Automatic scaling capabilities without manual intervention
The Snowflake data cloud represents a significant departure from traditional data warehousing solutions. Built as a true software as a service offering, Snowflake’s virtual data warehouse approach separates the storage layer from compute resources, allowing each to scale independently. This architecture enables near-instantaneous scaling—both up and down—in response to changing workload demands.
Available across multiple cloud providers including AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Snowflake offers true cloud flexibility that appeals to organizations seeking to avoid vendor lock-in.
Redshift vs Snowflake: What’s the Difference?
Feature / Aspect | Snowflake | Amazon Redshift |
---|---|---|
Primary product type | Cloud data platform and data warehouse with growing virtualization features | Cloud data warehouse with some federated query and virtualization capabilities |
Data Virtualization support | Supports external tables, data sharing, and Snowflake External Tables that query data in external cloud storage (S3, Azure Blob, GCS) without loading. Supports Snowflake Data Marketplace for sharing data. Offers Snowflake Federated Query to query external databases like AWS RDS and Aurora directly using Snowflake External Functions and External Tables. | Supports Redshift Spectrum to query data directly in S3 without loading it into Redshift. Supports Federated Query to query live data in RDS, Aurora, and other Redshift clusters. Offers Data Sharing within Redshift for cross-account data access. Supports Materialized Views for query acceleration. |
Virtualization scope | Focuses on combining data stored internally with external cloud data sources (data lakes) and external DBs via federated queries. Enables logical data layer on distributed sources. | Primarily designed for data warehousing, but Spectrum and Federated Query extend querying to external S3 and RDS/Aurora databases, allowing some level of virtualization. |
Query federation | Yes, via external tables over cloud storage and federated queries to supported databases (via JDBC/ODBC integration or external functions). | Yes, Spectrum queries S3 directly; Federated Query supports querying RDS/Aurora and other Redshift clusters. |
Supported external sources | Cloud object storage (S3, Azure Blob, GCS) as external tables; JDBC/ODBC data sources via external functions and connectors. | S3 (via Spectrum); RDS and Aurora (via Federated Query); Redshift clusters. |
Performance optimizations for virtualization | Uses Result Caching, Metadata Caching, Automatic Clustering, and pushdown optimization on external tables. Supports Materialized Views on external data. | Spectrum uses massively parallel processing (MPP) to query S3; Federated Query pushes down filters to external RDS/Aurora. Materialized Views help speed queries inside Redshift. |
Security and Governance | Fine-grained access controls on external tables, data masking, and dynamic data sharing. Full audit and governance integrated with Snowflake’s platform. | Access control at schema, table, and column level in Redshift and Spectrum. Federated Query inherits source DB security. AWS IAM integrates across services. |
Integration ecosystem | Native connectors to BI tools, support for external function calls, and Snowflake Data Marketplace for sharing datasets. | Integrates deeply with AWS ecosystem: Glue catalog, Athena, Lambda, and other AWS analytics tools. |
Deployment model | Fully managed cloud service on AWS, Azure, and GCP. | Fully managed cloud service on AWS only. |
Pricing model relevant to virtualization | Pay per second of compute for virtual warehouse clusters; storage separate. External table queries and data sharing incur additional costs. | On-demand or reserved instance pricing for clusters; Spectrum charges per TB scanned from S3. Federated Query uses Redshift resources, billed under cluster compute time. |
Ideal virtualization use cases | Hybrid analytics combining data warehouse data with cloud data lakes and external sources; sharing live data across organizations; federated queries spanning multiple clouds. |
Analytics combining Redshift warehouse data with large S3 data lakes; ad hoc querying of external transactional data in RDS/Aurora; sharing data across Redshift accounts. |
Key Strengths of Snowflake for Data Virtualization
-
Seamless External Tables & Cloud Data Lake Integration: Snowflake external tables allow you to query data directly from S3, Azure Blob, or GCS without loading it into Snowflake. This provides a true logical virtualization layer over cloud object storage, enabling a “data lakehouse” architecture.
-
Cross-Cloud Support: Unlike Redshift, which is AWS-only, Snowflake runs on AWS, Azure, and GCP, allowing you to virtualize data stored in different cloud providers within one platform.
-
Federated Query Support: Snowflake has evolving capabilities to query external databases (including RDS and Aurora) using external functions and external tables, though it’s not as mature as Redshift’s federated query features yet.
-
Data Sharing & Marketplace: Snowflake’s Secure Data Sharing enables live, governed sharing of virtualized data with other Snowflake accounts or third parties without copying data. The Data Marketplace lets organizations access third-party datasets as virtual tables.
-
Automatic Performance Optimization: Snowflake handles clustering, caching, and query pushdown automatically, making virtualization queries faster and requiring less manual tuning.
Key Strengths of Amazon Redshift for Data Virtualization
-
Redshift Spectrum: Spectrum allows querying vast amounts of data directly on S3 using standard SQL, without loading it into Redshift. It can query data stored in open formats like Parquet, ORC, and JSON. This is widely used for extending warehouse queries to data lakes.
-
Federated Query: Redshift can directly query live data in RDS and Aurora, enabling operational analytics by virtualizing transactional databases in real time.
-
Materialized Views and Result Caching: Redshift supports materialized views and automatic caching to accelerate queries, including those that join external and internal data.
-
Deep AWS Ecosystem Integration: As part of AWS, Redshift integrates tightly with AWS Glue Data Catalog for metadata management, AWS IAM for security, and other AWS services (Lambda, S3, CloudTrail) facilitating governance and automation.
-
Mature Federated Query Support: Redshift’s federated query capability to RDS/Aurora is mature and well-documented, enabling hybrid transactional-analytical processing scenarios.
Aspect | Snowflake | Amazon Redshift |
---|---|---|
Cloud portability | Multi-cloud: AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS only |
External table support | Supports external tables on multiple cloud object stores | Supports external tables only on AWS S3 via Spectrum |
Federated query maturity | Emerging; supports external databases via functions, limited data sources | Mature for RDS/Aurora and Redshift clusters |
Data sharing across orgs | Strong, built-in secure data sharing | Available within Redshift accounts only |
Performance on virtualized queries | Highly optimized with caching and pushdown optimizations | Good, with Spectrum and pushdown filters to external DBs |
Pricing for virtualization workloads | Pay per-second compute, additional cost for data sharing and external table queries | Pay per cluster-hour; Spectrum charges per TB scanned on S3 |
Ecosystem lock-in | Multi-cloud reduces lock-in | Strong AWS ecosystem lock-in |
Ease of setup and use | Simplified UI, automatic tuning, cloud-native architecture | Tight integration in AWS ecosystem, mature tooling |
Supported data formats | Parquet, ORC, JSON, Avro across clouds | Parquet, ORC, JSON on S3 (Spectrum) |
Factory Thread – Real-Time Operational Virtualization for Industrial Environments
While Snowflake and Redshift offer strong virtualization features for cloud data lakes and external databases, Factory Thread brings a real-time, no-code virtualization layer purpose-built for manufacturing and operational data. It connects ERP, MES, SQL, flat files, and cloud APIs without replication—delivering live data as a service to analytics tools like Power BI, Tableau, or custom apps.
Category | Factory Thread | Snowflake | Amazon Redshift |
---|---|---|---|
Primary Focus | Real-time operational data unification | Multi-cloud data lakehouse with external access | AWS-based cloud data warehouse with Spectrum/Federated Query |
Real-Time Data Virtualization | Native, low-latency, no data movement | Partial (via external tables and functions) | Partial (via Spectrum & Federated Query) |
Deployment Model | Hybrid (cloud + on-prem + edge) | Cloud-only (AWS, Azure, GCP) | Cloud-only (AWS only) |
Data Movement | None – virtual layer across ERP, MES, SQL, APIs | Supports external table queries (cloud object storage) | Queries external S3/RDS but still relies on cloud compute |
User Interface | No-code/AI workflow builder | Web UI with SQL + visual tools | SQL-driven, AWS console based |
System Integration Strength | Industrial systems: MES, ERP, SQL, APIs | Cloud storage + federated DBs | AWS S3, RDS, Aurora |
Federated Query Capability | Built-in across hybrid environments | Growing support via external functions | Mature for AWS ecosystem |
Cloud Ecosystem Support | Neutral (AWS, Azure, on-prem, edge) | Multi-cloud: AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS-only |
Ideal Use Cases | Real-time operations, factory analytics, hybrid systems | Cross-cloud analytics, external data sharing | AWS-centric hybrid analytics |
Security & Governance | Built-in encryption, role-based access, local audit | Fine-grained access control, masking, governance | IAM integration, schema/table-level controls |
BI/Tool Integration | OData & REST endpoints for Power BI/Tableau/custom apps | Supports JDBC, ODBC, BI tools, Data Marketplace | Integrates with AWS analytics stack, Glue, and BI tools |
Key strengths of Factory Thread for data virtualization:
-
True Real-Time Federation: Factory Thread creates virtualized views across on-prem and cloud sources (like Siemens Opcenter, Rockwell Plex, SAP) without moving data, enabling real-time monitoring and decision-making.
-
No-Code Integration & Orchestration: Build and schedule data flows with a drag-and-drop interface or describe them in plain English using AI.
-
On-Prem + Edge Deployments: Unlike Snowflake and Redshift, Factory Thread supports edge and local environments natively, making it ideal for plants, warehouses, and facilities.
-
Secure, Compliant Architecture: Offers built-in encryption, role-based access, and audit trails suitable for regulated industries.
-
Unified Access Layer: Publish OData/REST endpoints directly from virtualized flows—allowing BI tools and applications to consume live data without loading it into a warehouse.
Ideal for:
✔ Real-time dashboards and alerts
✔ Factory-floor analytics and supply chain visibility
✔ Integrating legacy systems with modern cloud tools
✔ Minimizing data latency in manufacturing decisions
Factory Thread isn’t just an alternative—it’s a specialized solution for organizations where time-to-decision is critical, infrastructure is hybrid, and operational data lives across many platforms. It complements (or replaces) traditional cloud warehouses by offering instant insight without storage duplication or lag.
Share this
You May Also Like
These Related Stories

Denodo vs Tableau: A Comparative Analysis of Data Visualization Tools

Denodo vs. Snowflake: Which Data Platform is Right for You?

No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think